The Most Expensive Fractal in the World
Friday, November 10, 2006
R.A. DiDio in Art, Fractals

583047-545872-thumbnail.jpg
No. 5, 1948 (click to enlarge)
The basic free market model of supply and demand is pushed to the limit in the case of the price of art pieces. Just how much will someone pay when the supply is only one, i.e. when the piece is one of a kind?  Especially when the artist was truly one of a kind?

Last week the Jackson Pollock painting No. 5, 1948  was sold at auction for $140 Million, the most money ever paid for an American painting. (Click here for story) 

This stunning number is now going to color the debate on the validity of the Pollock paintings discovered earlier this year and claimed to be possible frauds because they were not fractal enough.  (See my previous post on this controversy.)  Given that computer software can regularly produce fractals with the same fractal dimension as any of Pollock's paintings, determining if a painting is an original Pollock or a computer-generated image should be a concern for anyone with $140 Million to burn.

This  situation suggests that a lucrative, niche career-op exists for anyone who can discern the difference - a fractaconsulter.

Article originally appeared on A non-linear space for students of Chaos and Fractals (http://www.fractalog.com/).
See website for complete article licensing information.