« Stanislaw Lem: The Passing of a Deep Spirit | Main | Splattery Will Get You Somewhere: Fractal Forgery »
Wednesday
Mar292006

Jackson Pollock coughing up fractals...

coughing.jpgAfter writing the previous post on the Jackson Pollock Fractal Forgery Fuss, I remembered that I had come across a poem about Pollock and fractals written by Theresa Hawkes a few years ago. The poem, titled The Artist Under Glass Talks Back, is a paean to artists , who are defined by their prescient ability to know the world ...

They feel the timbre and tenor of their times
long before they have facts to back up their impressions --

   light and dark shadows of an entire world's thoughts and dreams
   are automatically recorded deep inside them
   not quite as distinctly
   as the first photographic plate
   of silver halides laughing back images
   of the sun slanting over a Parisian rooftop
   recorded what it saw.

Jackson Pollack coughing up fractals
onto the cold floor of a barn
in the middle of a century
stuck in the shallow veneer of appearance,
uncovering depth-soundings of the intricacy and interwoven trajectories

of everything above, between, beyond.


To my reading, the poem is also a rejoinder to those who might believe in the power of science, and, by implication, mathematics, to produce art. So I'm intrigued by the juxtaposition of Pollock's passion and the mathematics implied by the term "fractals." Here Hawkes' painful-sounding image of "coughing up fractals" neatly removes the paradox, making Pollock's work organic, and the antithesis of a mathematical process. The poem then adds an interesting counterpoint to the fractal analysis of Pollock's work that is so much in vogue.

I think that I may be misreading the poem, or Hawke's sentiment. After I had put a link to Hawkes' poem on the Chaos and Fractal course site back in Fall 2003, she came across my reference and wrote me a letter describing her efforts on marrying science and the arts ...

"Good afternoon Dr. DiDio. I publish The Oracular Tree, an alternative ezine using serial fiction, poetry, and essays to imagine and describe our world as it might become as we transition from our agricultural and industrial past to a future based in science and the technological advances of modern western civilization. I came across your Chaos and Fractals Seminar site purely by accident...I noticed this seminar uses Ray Bradbury and a poem by me (Teresa Hawkes) to help illustrate concepts of chaos and fractals. This is tremendously heartening to me to see that artists can help illustrate scientific concepts. Many artists are deeply inspired by the work of scientists and attempt to incorporate it into their work in an accurate manner, as I'm sure you know."

oracular_tree.jpgWell, I didn't know much about artists incorporating the work of scientists (other than fractals), so now I regularly visit the Oracular Tree, where I often find some new poem, or essay with an interesting science component, often accompanied by a beautiful fractal image. A recent example is the 3/26/2006 "meditation" The Aperture Problem and the Group Mind, also by Hawkes.

See the Oracular Tree for more info on Hawkes and all of the art and artists that make up the site.

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (5)

Human Fractal
It is apparent that Jackson Pollock had no trouble in finding the true fractals in himself. So with this post, I attempt to find the true fractals in myself. I dare others to find the natural fractals in there life. Human fractals are expressed in this paper in relation to Pollock.
March 31, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterMatt Myerson
hello hello. for anyone interested who may be reading this, I wrote this poem a few years ago upon reading the Discover Magazine article noted here. Any feedback would be lovely, though not necessary. It seemed particularly relevant in light of the other poem quoted above, and its first line. I feel like my poem draws some of the same conclusions. Man, am I ever hooked on fractalog!

Poem For Benoit Mandelbrot, A Connoisseur of Chaos

You, who would provide Stevens
With his pages of illustrations,
Are a true connoisseur.

You, who have traced in violent spirals
Of mathematics, the outline
Of nature's all-pervading puzzle,
Are one with your science.

You have charted an ebb and flow
Of numbers so complex as to
Confuse my mind's compass.

And as I spin round and down
Seduced by hope of light
I am engulfed by elegant swells.

I surface again,
Dumbly aware, buoyant
In your heavy chaos.

My limbs flail at the symmetry of your designs
My eyes search the blank horizons
For the pattern of dry sanity.

Briefly I taste the salt sting
Of equations I'll never understand,
But a wave of awe
Sweeps me up as if divine
Artistry had finally
Conformed to a function of
Some rigid geometry.

Can any man be more than an artist?
May 1, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterFish
hey. me again.

why does the mathematics have to be producing art? why can't the mathematics be art itself? would that actually solve any of the problems discussed here.
May 1, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterFish again
Fish - A great poem! I'd like to give you some credit, so, if you don't mind, I will re-produce this as a main post, and link back to the NC Arts Council site.

And why was your worst math class Math 32L ? What is it?
May 15, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterRich DiDio
Fish - your question about whether mathematics itself is the art is a good one. Mathematicians would certainly agree, but I don't believe it removes the "controversy". As always, the beholder rules on beauty, and gets to define what is art...
May 15, 2006 | Unregistered CommenterRich DiDio

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Textile formatting is allowed.